The
core principles driving the research team relate directly to FOTO’s
purpose, which is to provide reliable, valid and responsive outcomes
measures and aggregate data management services to enable real-time
information that empowers clinicians, patients, payers, policy makers, and
facilitates choice, delivery and payment based on the most effective
rehabilitation therapy. To
accomplish FOTO’s purpose, the research team has been active since 1992
analyzing the data collected during every day outpatient rehabilitation.
(Published Paper) Our research represents effectiveness research, which by definition
addresses the questions confronting clinicians and patients daily: · What works · What works for which patients · How can we improve our understanding of patient outcomes · How can we apply our knowledge of effectiveness research · How can we balance effectiveness with efficiency To
address “What works”, we need to know did
the patient get better. This means we need outcomes measures that are
reliable, valid and responsive. We continuously investigate the measures
we collect on patients. (Reference) Current measurement efforts are driven by Item
Response Theory (Reference) methods and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT
Central)
because many believe IRT and CAT will be the future of patient-self report
of functional status. Research findings from the FOTO team have supported
this belief.
(Reference)
(Reference)
(Reference)
Hence, the research team is developing body part specific
CATs because results support the psychometrics and efficiency of the CATs.
To
address “What works for which patients”, the research team is studying
patient classification procedures that have been shown to successfully
classify patients into clinically meaningful homogeneous subgroups. Such
classification allows clinicians to direct treatment designed to produce
better outcomes for patients managed with prescriptive treatments and to
improve prediction of outcomes. To
address “How can we apply our knowledge of effectiveness research”,
the research team in conjunction with our Providers Relations Department
continuously update the way clinicians’ outcomes are reported. Our
outcomes reports now include risk-adjusted data, which allows more
meaningful interpretations of benchmarked data. Reports also identify
measurement change that was greater than measurement error. To
address “How can we balance effectiveness with efficiency”, our
research team is investigating pay-for-performance (i.e., value-based
purchasing) methods of reimbursement. In a P4P payment process,
risk-adjusted functional status change (i.e., effectiveness) is matched to
the number of visits used (i.e., efficiency). In this way, providers who
gain greater than expected outcomes using fewer than expected visits will
be identified for higher reimbursements. In this way, the research team is
involved in the evolution of the medical delivery system, which is
progressing towards the Institute of Medicine’s vision of the future
where clinical services will be safe, effective, patient-centered, timely,
efficient, and equitable.
|
|||
| ©2006 Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
| News | |
P4P
Report |
|
| Papers
Published Using FOTO Data Patient Self-Report Reliability and Validity White Paper Frequently Asked Questions Research Awards CAT References |
|
| Present | |
|
|
Recent Papers
Published |
| Future | |
| Important Links | |
| Cat Central Qmetric's Headache Cat METRIC
|
|